Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sandy Smith's avatar

So many good points! Thank you for putting this into words.

Expand full comment
Ken Fenton's avatar

Thank you for your article. Very good. Your article references your 2017 article titled “Why every man’s battle backfires: we should expect men not to lust”. In that article you say:

“I am not saying that no Christian man will struggle with lust; we are fallen creatures, and this side of heaven we will all struggle to some degree with all sins, and to a major degree with certain ones. We all have our own weaknesses, and lust is one of the most common one. But to say that every single man will not be able to look at a beautiful woman with cleavage showing without lust in his heart is also to say that Jesus doesn’t make a difference.”

Sheila, you are right to reject the teaching that makes women responsible for men’s lust, because, as you have well-argued, not only is this teaching unbiblical but it is damaging to both women and men.

However if anyone suggests that a man [unless he is very tired, preoccupied, or is gay] can “look at a beautiful woman with cleavage” and not be immediately sexually interested, is naive. It is impossible for a man to un-see a woman’s cleavage. Yes, it is entirely the man’s responsibility not to let his thoughts linger into lust. But it also seems unwise for a woman who wants a man to look her in the eyes and relate with her as a person, to, at the same time, present him visually with her physical sexuality, the cleavage of her breasts. A man then has to concentrate on the person, while just below, in plain view, are the tokens of her sexuality. This seems silly and unnecessary.

‘It takes two to Tango’: men are fully responsible not to let what they cannot un-see linger into lust, while women can help by not exercising their freedom in unhelpful ways.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts